• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage
  • Life Sciences
  • Research

HIMSS: Only 3% of Providers Are Highly Prepared for Pay-for-Value Transition

by HITC Staff 03/03/2016 Leave a Comment

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

6 Metrics to Improve Hospital Revenue Cycle ROI_Pay-for-Value Transition

Only three percent of respondents believe their organization is highly prepared to make the pay-for-value transition, according to the findings of the 2016 HIMSS Cost Accounting Survey.  The survey reflects the insights of 102 executives and finance professionals from an array of U.S. healthcare provider organizations. examines the approach healthcare providers are pursuing as they manage the changing payment landscape. 

The transition from fee-for-service to pay-for-value has been referred to as one of the greatest financial challenges the U.S. healthcare system currently faces. Although this change is expected to happen over an extended period of time, CMS has announced aggressive goals for making the move with Medicare providers and hospitals. This requires healthcare providers to effectively navigate the challenges posed by a payment model that requires sharing and analyzing of data in ways that fee-for service and its legacy revenue cycle management systems and business processes never contemplated.

The awareness of these challenges associated with a pay-for-value transition varies by market. With approximately half of the survey respondents representing an organization participating in an alternative payment model, those serving an urban market (69 percent serving both urban and rural communities; 48 percent exclusively urban) were more likely to participate in alternative payment models than those exclusively serving rural markets (31 percent). 

Many healthcare organizations have a formal process for determining healthcare costs, but only 39 percent regularly review those costs to ensure their information is current. Providers use an array of factors when determining service prices with profit margin necessary to maintain financial health and actual cost to deliver the care emerging as the most important factors. But, less than one-third of respondents have the ability to evaluate these costs in an automated fashion even though many have plans to expand the price transparency efforts

Top 3 Needs in Transitioning to a Value-based Payment System

The survey asked respondents to rank their organization’s readiness to move from a fee-for-service to value-based payment model, respondents indicated that the top areas of need were:

  • Tools to track and evaluate quality of care;
  • Better communication between disparate providers; and
  • Consistent definition of quality by specific type of disease.

To download the complete 2016 HIMSS Cost Accounting Survey, please visit: http://www.himss.org/2016-cost-accounting-survey

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Insights

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

Featured Interview

Virta Health CEO: GLP-1s Didn’t Kill Weight Watchers, Its Broken Model Did

Most-Read

Moving Beyond EHRs: What Lies Ahead for Healthcare Digitization?

AI Agents vs. Chatbots: Understanding Agentic AI’s Role in Healthcare

AI Breakthrough Reveals 2025 AI Breakthrough Award Winners

AI Breakthrough Reveals 2025 AI Breakthrough Award Winners

Healthcare's Big Blind Spot: The Measurement Crisis in Inpatient Psychiatry

Healthcare’s Big Blind Spot: The Measurement Crisis in Inpatient Psychiatry

Lessons Learned from The Change Healthcare Cyberattack, One Year Later

Lessons Learned from The Change Healthcare Cyberattack, One Year Later

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches "CloseKnit" Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches “CloseKnit” Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Omada Health Launches "Nutritional Intelligence" with AI Agent OmadaSpark

Omada Health Soars in NASDAQ Debut, Signaling Digital Health IPO Rebound

Medtronic to Separate Diabetes Business into New Standalone Company

Medtronic to Separate Diabetes Business into New Standalone Company

White House, IBM Partner to Fight COVID-19 Using Supercomputers

HHS Sets Pricing Targets for Trump’s EO on Most-Favored-Nation Drug Pricing

23andMe to Mine Genetic Data for Drug Discovery

Regeneron to Acquire Key 23andMe Assets for $256M, Pledges Continuity of Consumer Genome Services

CureIS Healthcare Sues Epic: Alleges Anti-Competitive Practices & Trade Secret Theft

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Submit An Op-Ed
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2025. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |