• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Life Sciences
  • Investments
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage

69% of Providers/Payers Are Uncomfortable with Risks of Value-Based Care

by HITC Staff 02/29/2016 Leave a Comment

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

69% of Providers/Payers Are Uncomfortable with Risks of Value-Based Care

By 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will require 50 percent of payments to be value-based, meaning providers are compensated for healthy outcomes rather than each service provided. According to new research from Xerox, 69 percent of healthcare providers and payers are uncomfortable with the risks of value-based care, and 77 percent agree that some providers are losing money by adopting the approach.

The Xerox survey reveals that healthcare payers and providers have some apprehension about the shift to value-based healthcare. 43 percent of healthcare providers and payers say value-based contracts make up less than 10 percent of their current portfolio, leaving much ground to make up. 

Other key finding of the survey include: 

– Of the commercial reimbursements, 64% are currently 50% or less value-based

– 67% of Payer/Providers have either already switched (19%) or are currently looking to switch (48%) to a value-based model

– By 2018, 67% of respondents believed that at least half their payments/reimbursements would be value-based (though only 6% have already attained this mark).

– Of the Payer/Providers who’ve already implemented value-based care, half indicate they are already seeing the benefits

– A solid majority of our sample agreed that value-based care would provide at least some benefits for all three major parties: payers (86% agree to some extent), patients (82%), and providers (76%)

– When asked about their major concerns with value-based care, Payer/Providers indicated the top three were “how to measure healthy outcomes” (83%), followed by “cost containment” (81%), and “an inability for providers to make the journey/poorly optimized physician networks” (80%).

– Solid majorities of Payer/Providers indicate How much additional support are you needing to manage your value-based care in the following areas? they need of at least some help to handle the challenges of implementing value-based care across the full gamut of analytics, software, service, technology, and people-based services

– To build value-based contracts, Payers/Providers indicate they currently have a range of information needs, particularly with clinical data (64%). 

To view the full results of the survey, visit: www.xerox.com/healthcaresurvey.

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tagged With: Value-Based Care

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Interview

Reach7 Diabetes Studios Founder Chun Yong on Reimagining Chronic Care with a Concierge Medical Model

Most-Read

HHS Finalizes HTI-4 Rule: Prior Authorization & E-Prescribing Interoperability

HHS Finalizes HTI-4 Rule: Prior Authorization & E-Prescribing Interoperability

Meaningful Use Penalties_Meaningful Use_Partial Code Free_Senators Urge CMS to Establish Clear Metrics for ICD-10 Testing

CMS Finalizes TEAM Model: A New Era of Value-Based Surgical Care

White House Event Unveils CMS Health Tech Ecosystem Initiative

White House Event Unveils CMS Health Tech Ecosystem Initiative

Digital Health Faces Q2'25 Pullback: Funding Falls to 5-Year Low, But AI Dominates and $1B+ IPOs Emerge

Healthcare Investment Shifts in 1H 2025: AI Remains a Bright Spot Amidst Fundraising Decline

Digital Health Faces Q2'25 Pullback: Funding Falls to 5-Year Low

Digital Health Faces Q2’25 Pullback: Funding Falls to 5-Year Low

Beyond the Hype: Building AI Systems in Healthcare Where Hallucinations Are Not an Option

Beyond the Hype: Building AI Systems in Healthcare Where Hallucinations Are Not an Option

Health IT Sector Navigates Policy Turbulence with Resilient M&A

Health IT’s New Chapter: IPOs Return, Resilient M&A, Valuations Rise in 1H 2025

PwC Report: US Medical Cost Trend to Remain Elevated at 8.5% in 2026

PwC Report: US Medical Cost Trend to Remain Elevated at 8.5% in 2026

Philips Launches ECG AI Marketplace, Partnering with Anumana to Enhance Cardiac Care with AI-Powered Diagnostics

Philips Launches ECG AI Marketplace, Partnering with Anumana to Enhance Cardiac Care with AI-Powered Diagnostics

WeightWatchers Emerges from Bankruptcy, Launches New Menopause Program

WeightWatchers Emerges from Bankruptcy, Launches New Menopause Program

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Submit An Op-Ed
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2025. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |