• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Life Sciences
  • Investments
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage

69% of Providers/Payers Are Uncomfortable with Risks of Value-Based Care

by HITC Staff 02/29/2016 Leave a Comment

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

69% of Providers/Payers Are Uncomfortable with Risks of Value-Based Care

By 2018, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will require 50 percent of payments to be value-based, meaning providers are compensated for healthy outcomes rather than each service provided. According to new research from Xerox, 69 percent of healthcare providers and payers are uncomfortable with the risks of value-based care, and 77 percent agree that some providers are losing money by adopting the approach.

The Xerox survey reveals that healthcare payers and providers have some apprehension about the shift to value-based healthcare. 43 percent of healthcare providers and payers say value-based contracts make up less than 10 percent of their current portfolio, leaving much ground to make up. 

Other key finding of the survey include: 

– Of the commercial reimbursements, 64% are currently 50% or less value-based

– 67% of Payer/Providers have either already switched (19%) or are currently looking to switch (48%) to a value-based model

– By 2018, 67% of respondents believed that at least half their payments/reimbursements would be value-based (though only 6% have already attained this mark).

– Of the Payer/Providers who’ve already implemented value-based care, half indicate they are already seeing the benefits

– A solid majority of our sample agreed that value-based care would provide at least some benefits for all three major parties: payers (86% agree to some extent), patients (82%), and providers (76%)

– When asked about their major concerns with value-based care, Payer/Providers indicated the top three were “how to measure healthy outcomes” (83%), followed by “cost containment” (81%), and “an inability for providers to make the journey/poorly optimized physician networks” (80%).

– Solid majorities of Payer/Providers indicate How much additional support are you needing to manage your value-based care in the following areas? they need of at least some help to handle the challenges of implementing value-based care across the full gamut of analytics, software, service, technology, and people-based services

– To build value-based contracts, Payers/Providers indicate they currently have a range of information needs, particularly with clinical data (64%). 

To view the full results of the survey, visit: www.xerox.com/healthcaresurvey.

 

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tagged With: Value-Based Care

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Research Report

2026 Best in KLAS Awards: The Full List of Software & Services Winners

Most-Read

The "Platform" Squeeze: Epic Releases Native AI Charting, Putting Venture-Backed Scribes on Notice

The “Platform” Squeeze: Epic Releases Native AI Charting, Putting Venture-Backed Scribes on Notice

Analysis: Oracle Cerner’s Plans for a National EHR

Oracle May Cut 30k Jobs and Sell Cerner to Fund $156B OpenAI Deal

The $1.9B Exit: Why CommonSpirit is Insourcing Revenue Cycle and Tenet is Betting Big on Conifer AI

The $1.9B Exit: Why CommonSpirit is Insourcing Revenue Cycle and Tenet is Betting Big on Conifer AI

KLAS 2026 Rankings: Aledade and Guidehealth Named Top VBC Enablement Firms

KLAS 2026 Rankings: Aledade and Guidehealth Named Top VBC Enablement Firms

Beyond the Hype: New KLAS Data Validates the Financial and Clinical ROI of Ambient AI

Beyond the Hype: New KLAS Data Validates the Financial and Clinical ROI of Ambient AI

Anthropic Debuts ‘Claude for Healthcare’ and Opus 4.5 to Engineer the Future of Life Sciences

Anthropic Debuts ‘Claude for Healthcare’ and Opus 4.5 to Engineer the Future of Life Sciences

OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health: A ‘Digital Front Door’ That Connects Medical Records to Agentic AI

OpenAI Debuts ChatGPT Health: A ‘Digital Front Door’ That Connects Medical Records to Agentic AI

From Genes to Hackers: The Hidden Cybersecurity Risks in Life Sciences

From Genes to Hackers: The Hidden Cybersecurity Risks in Life Sciences

Utah Becomes First State to Approve AI System for Prescription Renewals

Utah Becomes First State to Approve AI System for Prescription Renewals

NYC Health + Hospitals to Acquire Maimonides in $2.2B Safety Net Overhaul

NYC Health + Hospitals to Acquire Maimonides in $2.2B Safety Net Overhaul

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • 2026 Editorial Calendar
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Op-Ed Submission Guidelines
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2026. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |