• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage
  • Life Sciences
  • Research

Healthgrades: 1 in 6 Patients Receive Care In 1-Star Rated Hospitals

by Fred Pennic 10/21/2015 Leave a Comment

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

healthgrades logo

1 out of every 6 patients in the U.S. received care in a hospital rated 1-star[1], according to new research released by Healthgrades, the leading online resource for comprehensive information about physicians and hospitals. Had those patients researched local doctors and hospitals to identify and select a physician practicing in a 5-star hospital for their specific procedure or condition, they would have faced a 71 percent lower risk of dying or a 65 percent lower risk of experiencing complications during their hospital stay.  If all hospitals performed similarly to hospitals receiving 5-stars, 222,392 lives would have potentially been saved.[2]

Healthgrades 2016 Report to the Nation, which compares the patient outcomes resulting from care in hospitals rated 1-star (those with the higher risk adjusted complication rates and mortality rates) against 3-and 5-star hospitals in regions throughout the country, concludes that significant variation in health outcomes exists between hospitals throughout the U.S.

Many Patients Aren’t Receiving the Best Possible Care

As consumers take on greater responsibility for their medical costs due to rising premiums and the increase in high-deductible plans, it is increasingly important that they do their homework and select the right doctor and hospital for their specific needs. Healthgrades provides transparent access to accurate, objective data so that consumers and physicians can make more informed decisions when it comes to finding and connecting with the right physician.

According to Healthgrades, when presented with objective information – including physician experience, patient satisfaction and hospital outcomes – 85 percent[3] of patients would select a different physician than they did before doing their homework. Doing research to find the right physician, including understanding the quality of the hospitals where physicians practice, is essential to getting the right care.

“Because narrow networks are limiting many patients’ access to certain physicians and hospitals, it is more important than ever that consumers recognize the symbiotic relationship between doctor and hospital, and do their research to make what may be a lifesaving decision about the care they receive,” said Evan Marks, Chief Strategy Officer at Healthgrades. “Consumers need to trust that the information they’re using to inform their decisions is comprehensive, accurate and – most importantly – transparent. Transparency is crucial to fostering accountability at all levels of the healthcare industry, ultimately empowering consumers to use data to improve their chances of experiencing the best outcomes possible.”

Significant Quality Differences Exist at the Local Level

Healthgrades’ findings also reflect startling disparities at the local level. According to the report, hospitals within close proximity from each other can have significant differences in complication and mortality rates for the same condition or procedure. For example, in Denver, CO, when comparing patient clinical outcomes among hospitals for hip replacement surgery, complication rates varied significantly across facilities, from 3.9 percent to 13.6 percent. 

Additionally, few hospitals can claim superior performance across all conditions and procedures; While hospitals may receive a 5-star rating for one condition or procedure, they may not demonstrate superior performance across all areas evaluated. In the Chicago region, of 14 hospitals that received a 5-star rating for treating heart attacks, eight received a 1-star rating when evaluated for total knee replacement surgeries.

Significant Disparities Exist within Markets – Good News/Bad News

The quantity of hospitals in a region also does not directly correlate with the quality of care available to consumers. While most major metro areas may be home to more than 30 hospitals, only a small percentage may provide better than expected outcomes for the specific procedure a patient needs. For example:

  • In Chicago, of 46 hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) Surgery, only two have a 5-star rating for this procedure.
  • In Houston, of 38 hospitals that treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or emphysema, only one has a 5-star rating for this condition.
  • In the greater Los Angeles area, of 41 hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, only six have 5-star rating for this procedure.
  • In Philadelphia, of 34 hospitals that treat heart attack, only four have a 5-star rating for this condition.
  • In the greater New York area (including northern New Jersey), of 102 hospitals that perform colorectal surgeries, only two have a 5-star rating for these procedures.

“The hospital a patient selects for his or her care can significantly impact the chances of experiencing complications, or even mortality, for certain conditions or procedures,” said Archelle Georgiou, M.D., Strategic Advisor, Healthgrades. “With quality of life on the line, consumers must be proactive in researching their options and leveraging all the data at their fingertips to make the best decision possible.”

Healthgrades 2016 Report to the Nation not only includes more specific comparative data about hospitals throughout the U.S., but also provides consumers with guidance on ways to make the best choices to mitigate the risks of having negative outcomes.  In addition, Healthgrades has created regional pocket guides – for 50 key markets in the U.S. – highlighting the top performing hospitals for specific conditions and procedures.  These pocket guides complement the in-depth information available at Healthgrades.com and provide consumers with an easy to access resource to choose the right hospital for the right care.

Healthgrades is the only site that provides consumers with information on more than 12,000 diseases, conditions and procedures and 1,100 specialties, based on data from more than 90% of inpatient hospital admissions. Access to this data empowers consumers to make informed healthcare decisions and select the right doctor and right hospital for their personal and specific care needs.

Report Background/Methodology

Unlike other organizations evaluating hospital quality, Healthgrades provides objective measures rooted solely in the domains of clinical science and statistical analysis, leaving perception and reputation out of the equation. Every year, Healthgrades analyzes three years Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) data to produce a detailed report on complication and mortality rates in America’s hospitals. Healthgrades findings empower consumers to evaluate and compare hospital performance.

For the 2016 report, Healthgrades analyzed approximately 45 million Medicare patient records for nearly 4,500 short-term, acute care hospitals nationwide, assessing hospital performance relative to  common in-hospital conditions and procedures for the Medicare population from 2012 through 2014 and one condition based on All-payer state data from 2011 through 2013.

Healthgrades models adjust for risk factors that influence patient outcomes. These factors may include age, gender, specific procedure performed, and co-morbid conditions, such as high blood pressure and diabetes. The outcomes reflect clinically-based measures, including in-hospital complications or in-hospital and 30-day post-admission mortality.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Insights

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

Featured Interview

Kinetik CEO Sufian Chowdhury on Fighting NEMT Fraud & Waste

Most-Read

UnitedHealth Group Names Stephen Hemsley CEO as Andrew Witty Steps Down

UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty Steps Down, Stephen Hemsley Returns as CEO

Omada Health Files for IPO

Omada Health Files for IPO

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches "CloseKnit" Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches “CloseKnit” Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

2019 MedTech Breakthrough Award Category Winners Announced

MedTech Breakthrough Announces 2025 MedTech Breakthrough Award Winners

WeightWatchers Files for Bankruptcy to Eliminate $1.15B in Debt

WeightWatchers Files for Bankruptcy to Eliminate $1.15B in Debt

KLAS: Epic Dominates 2024 EHR Market Share Amid Focus on Vendor Partnership; Oracle Health Sees Losses Despite Tech Advances

KLAS: Epic Dominates 2024 EHR Market Share Amid Focus on Vendor Partnership; Oracle Health Sees Losses Despite Tech Advances

'Cranky Index' Reveals EHR Alert Frustration Peaks Midweek, Highest Among Admin Staff

‘Cranky Index’ Reveals EHR Alert Frustration Peaks Midweek, Highest Among Admin Staff

Madison Dearborn Partners to Acquire Significant Stake in NextGen Healthcare

Madison Dearborn Partners to Acquire Significant Stake in NextGen Healthcare

Wandercraft Begins Clinical Trials for Physical AI-Powered Personal Exoskeleton

Wandercraft Begins Clinical Trials for Physical AI-Powered Personal Exoskeleton

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Submit An Op-Ed
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2025. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |