• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage
  • Life Sciences
  • Research

3 Biggest Challenges to Value-Based Payment Models Success

by Fred Pennic 05/21/2014 3 Comments

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Value-Based Payment Models 1

Coordination of care, data accuracy and staff acceptance are among the top three challenges to the future use of value-based payment models, according to a new study by Availity. The study found 75 percent of providers currently participate in at least one value-based payment model in addition to traditional fee for service with 60 percent expecting them to become the dominant payment model. Despite its growing dominance, fewer than 30 percent believe they offer a good level of reward for the risk.

The Provider Attitudes Toward Value-Based Payment Models study highlights feedback from more than 500 physician practice and hospital-based professionals nationwide. It summarizes the providers’ real-world experience with these new models, revealing perspectives on the impact they will have to the health care system, and calling out the gaps and barriers hindering success. The study follows the 2013 research Availity conducted to determine the operational readiness of providers and health plans to implement value-based models of care and reimbursement.

Managing value-based payment models alongside existing fee-for-service arrangements, and across numerous health plans, is creating issues that range from accurate revenue forecasting to workflow integration challenges. According to one physician practice respondent, “The administrative complexity of administering these plans is likely to be costly. The unpredictability of the revenue stream is likely going to make administering some of these plans not worth the cost.”

Other key findings include:

– More than 60% consider themselves at least “somewhat knowledgeable” about value-based payments
– Only about 25% agree that value-based payment models make it easy to understand, track and project revenue
– More than 80% of providers cited the need for additional staff and time to manage value-based models that represent less than 20% of their current revenues
– About half agree that value-based payments models will:

      – Improve population health
      – Improve the patient experience
      – Reduce the cost of healthcare

– Provider revenue from value-based payments is less than 20% but is expected to grow significantly over the next three years.

– More than 75% of physician practices and 88% of facilities agree that real time information sharing and access is critical for success
– Data accuracy, data management, and implementation assistance were cited as top gaps to value-based payment models

photo credit: colindunn via cc

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tagged With: Value-Based Payment Models

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Insights

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

Featured Interview

Paradigm Shift in Diabetes Care with Studio Clinics: Q&A with Reach7 Founder Chun Yong

Most-Read

Medtronic to Separate Diabetes Business into New Standalone Company

Medtronic to Separate Diabetes Business into New Standalone Company

White House, IBM Partner to Fight COVID-19 Using Supercomputers

HHS Sets Pricing Targets for Trump’s EO on Most-Favored-Nation Drug Pricing

23andMe to Mine Genetic Data for Drug Discovery

Regeneron to Acquire Key 23andMe Assets for $256M, Pledges Continuity of Consumer Genome Services

CureIS Healthcare Sues Epic: Alleges Anti-Competitive Practices & Trade Secret Theft

The Evolving Role of Physician Advisors: Bridging the Gap Between Clinicians and Administrators

The Evolving Physician Advisor: From UM to Value-Based Care & AI

UnitedHealth Group Names Stephen Hemsley CEO as Andrew Witty Steps Down

UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty Steps Down, Stephen Hemsley Returns as CEO

Omada Health Files for IPO

Omada Health Files for IPO

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches "CloseKnit" Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches “CloseKnit” Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

2019 MedTech Breakthrough Award Category Winners Announced

MedTech Breakthrough Announces 2025 MedTech Breakthrough Award Winners

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Submit An Op-Ed
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2025. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |