• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Behavioral Health
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Patient Engagement
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
    • Social Determinants of Health
  • Digital Health
    • AI
    • Blockchain
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • M&A
  • Value-based Care
    • Accountable Care (ACOs)
    • Medicare Advantage
  • Life Sciences
  • Research

AMA Releases Updated ICD-10 Implementation Costs for Physician Practices

by Fred Pennic 02/12/2014 1 Comment

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

ICD-10 implementation costs for physician practices are expected to be significantly more costly than previously estimated, according to an updated cost analysis report from the AMA (American Medical Association).

 The updated 2014 AMA cost analysis study written by Carolyn Hartley, Physicians EHR, and Stanley Nachimson from Nachimson Advisors takes into account the convergence of dynamic and financially demanding physician requirements which include:

  • Costs associated with paying for upgrades to EHR or PM (Practice Management System)
  • Meeting meaningful use requirements
  • ICD-10 testing
  • ICD-10 training

AMA’s Response Letter to HHS

In response to the recent updated findings from Nachimson Advisors, AMA CEO and Executive VP James Madara sent a letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius stating,

AMA CEO and Executive VP James Madara

“By itself, the implementation of ICD-10 is a massive undertaking. Yet, physicians are being asked to assume this burdensome requirement at the same time that they are being required to adopt new technology, re-engineer workflow, and reform the way they deliver care; all of which are interfering with their ability to care for patients and make investments to improve quality.

The AMA recognizes that our position on ICD-10 is at odds with many other well-intended stakeholders in the health care industry. We are not discounting the value ICD-10 data could have for research, public health surveillance, and other data analysis activities. Based on the concerns we articulate below, however, we question the logic of requiring physicians to adopt a new coding structure at this point in time.”

Madara also urged CMS and Medicare to:

  • Conduct true end-to-end testing.
  • Adopt a policy for Medicare that states when the most specific ICD-10 code is submitted by a physician no additional information will be required to adjudicate the claim, particularly in the absence of an  attachment standard.
  • adopt a policy for Medicare that provides a two-year  ‘implementation’ period during which Medicare will not be allowed to deny payment based  on the specificity of the ICD-10 code, will provide feedback to the physician on any coding concerns, and will not be allowed to recoup payment due to a lack of ICD-10 specificity.

Methodology

The updated report followed the general methodology used in the original 2008 report in addition to interviews from ICD-10 services based vendors and consultants. Additionally, six EHR vendors were interviewed to estimate the ICD-10 impact on Meaningful Use EHR systems. Costs are broken by:

  • Pre-Implementation Costs (Training, Assessment, Vendor/Software Upgrades, Process Remediation, Testing)
  • Post Implementation Costs (Productivity Loss, Payment Disruption)

Based on new information, the report categorized physician practices by:

  • Small Size Practice (3 Physicians & 2 Administrative Staff)
  • Medium Size Practice (10 Physicians, 1 Full-Time Coder, & 6 Administrative Staff)
  • Large Size Practice (100 Physicians, 64 Administrative Staff, & 10 Full-Time Coders)

Updated 2014 ICD-10 Implementation Costs Summary

The 2014 updated cost summary can be seen below:

Typical Small Practice

Typical Medium Practice

Typical Large Practice

2018 Estimate

 

$83,290

$285,195

$2,728,780

2014 Estimate

Pre-implementation costs
Training

$2,700 ‐ $3,000

$4,800 ‐ $7,900

$75,100

Assessment

$4,300 ‐ $7,000

$6,535 ‐ $9,600

$19,320

Vendor/Software Upgrades

$0 ‐ $60,000

$0 ‐ $200,000

$0 ‐ $2,000,000

Process Remediation

$3,312 ‐ $6,701

$6,211 ‐ $12,990

$14,874 ‐ $31,821

Testing

$15,248 ‐ $28,805

$47,906 ‐ $93,098

$428,740 ‐ $880,660

Total Pre‐Implementation Costs

$25,560 ‐ $105,506

$65,452 ‐ $323,588

$538,034 ‐ $3,006,901

Post ImplementationCosts
Productivity Loss

$8,500 ‐ $20,250

$72,649 to $166,649

$726,487 ‐ $1,666,487

Payment Disruption

$22,579 ‐ $100,349

$75,263 ‐ $334,498

$752,630 ‐ $3,344,976

Total Post‐Implementation Costs

$31,079 ‐ $120,599

$147,912 ‐ $501,147

$1,479,117 ‐ $5,011,463

Total Costs 

$56,639 ‐ $226,105

$213,364 ‐ $824,735 

$2,017,151 ‐ $8,018,364 

For physicians practices, a poorly executed ICD‐10 implementation effort will increase those risks and expose practices to large costs in 2014 and beyond.

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Print

Tap Native

Get in-depth healthcare technology analysis and commentary delivered straight to your email weekly

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to HIT Consultant

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Submit a Tip or Pitch

Featured Insights

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

2025 EMR Software Pricing Guide

Featured Interview

Kinetik CEO Sufian Chowdhury on Fighting NEMT Fraud & Waste

Most-Read

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches "CloseKnit" Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Launches “CloseKnit” Virtual-First Primary Care Option

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

Osteoboost Launches First FDA-Cleared Prescription Wearable Nationwide to Combat Low Bone Density

2019 MedTech Breakthrough Award Category Winners Announced

MedTech Breakthrough Announces 2025 MedTech Breakthrough Award Winners

WeightWatchers Files for Bankruptcy to Eliminate $1.15B in Debt

WeightWatchers Files for Bankruptcy to Eliminate $1.15B in Debt

KLAS: Epic Dominates 2024 EHR Market Share Amid Focus on Vendor Partnership; Oracle Health Sees Losses Despite Tech Advances

KLAS: Epic Dominates 2024 EHR Market Share Amid Focus on Vendor Partnership; Oracle Health Sees Losses Despite Tech Advances

'Cranky Index' Reveals EHR Alert Frustration Peaks Midweek, Highest Among Admin Staff

‘Cranky Index’ Reveals EHR Alert Frustration Peaks Midweek, Highest Among Admin Staff

Madison Dearborn Partners to Acquire Significant Stake in NextGen Healthcare

Madison Dearborn Partners to Acquire Significant Stake in NextGen Healthcare

Wandercraft Begins Clinical Trials for Physical AI-Powered Personal Exoskeleton

Wandercraft Begins Clinical Trials for Physical AI-Powered Personal Exoskeleton

Chipiron Secures $17M to Transform MRI Access with Portable Scanner

Chipiron Secures $17M to Transform MRI Access with Portable Scanner

Abbott to Integrate FreeStyle Libre Glucose Data with Epic EHR

Abbott to Integrate FreeStyle Libre Glucose Data with Epic EHR

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

Company

  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Submit An Op-Ed
  • Contact
  • Subscribe

Editorial Coverage

  • Opinion
  • Health IT
    • Care Coordination
    • EMR/EHR
    • Interoperability
    • Population Health Management
    • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Digital Health
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain Tech
    • Precision Medicine
    • Telehealth
    • Wearables
  • Startups
  • Value-Based Care
    • Accountable Care
    • Medicare Advantage

Connect

Subscribe to HIT Consultant Media

Latest insightful articles delivered straight to your inbox weekly

Copyright © 2025. HIT Consultant Media. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy |